Buy (your purchase supports 43 Folders) :. Street Price: about $80 (after current rebate). Basics: Ink jet 22 ppm b/w 15 ppm color 2 paper sources automatic duplex. The Winner: Canon Pixma iP3000 Photo Printer (including a couple phone calls to sales support and some assorted friends).īut, in the end, I decided to put my real-life money where my mouth theoretically should be: I popped in to CompUSA on Saturday morning and bought the recommended model that looked best to me-the Canon Pixma iP3000-and then spent the rest of the weekend testing it out. First, I took everyone’s suggestions (and warnings), compiled a tally count, and then did a bit of extra research on CNET, Epinions, etc. Duh, right?Īnyhow, to put this together, I’ve adopted a blended approach. This was borne out by the very wide range of suggestions you all submitted-over 30 different models by most all the major companies were mentioned (although only 4 got mentioned more than once)-as well as the plain fact it’s virtually impossible to give meaningful advice on a product you’ve never used. So I did what I always do: I asked for help.Įven as I started asking for reader advice on inexpensive printers that handle standard index cards well, I had a feeling this was going to be a tough post to put together. I’ve shared this interest since, frankly, I’ve been buffaloed as well-crippled by the crappiness of my old Epson and unsure what to try next. With this growth and interest have come a lot of requests from readers for the best, cheapest, and most Mac-friendly printer for printing directly to ordinary index cards. And you have the security of knowing that it can pull double duty as a general-purpose printer if you need it to.The Hipster PDA has been extended and improved beyond my wildest dreams thanks to things like GTDTiddlyWiki, Douglas Johnston’s D IY Planner, and John Norris’s very creative templates. If you need to print high-quality photos at high speeds, the iP8500 may well be your printer. Most of the photos qualified as true photo quality despite the flaws. Graphics had a tendency to lose thin lines, but photos were easily at the high end of very good, missing out on excellent because of a few minor flaws that only a well-trained eye would notice. For text, most fonts were easily readable at 4 points, but some stylized fonts required 12 points. Both types of output earned ratings at the high end of good. 
Text and graphics quality was also more than acceptable, but not impressive. For business applications, the iP8500 is faster than many ink jets, but not impressively fast, with a 22:57 total time, compared with 15:48 for the iP4000, for example.
Average time for each 4-by-6 was 47 seconds. Only the i9900 was faster, at 1:05 for each photo.
#CANON PIXMA IP3000 PHOTO PRINTER REVIEW FULL#
On our photo suite (timed with QualityLogic's hardware and software, each 8-by-10 photo took an average of 1 minute 35 seconds, a full minute faster than the Canon iP3000, iP4000, and MP780, which are essentially tied for next fastest. Spraying lots of drops at once pays off handsomely in photo speed. Best Malware Removal and Protection SoftwareĪnother similarity to the i9900 is a printhead with 6,144 nozzles.
0 kommentar(er)
